Search for: "RIVERS v. THE STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 4,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2016, 6:55 am
Here is the complaint in Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:30 am
Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:35 am
Ogden In 1808, the state government of New York awarded a private transport company a virtual monopoly to operate its steamboats on the state’s rivers and lakes, including rivers that ran between New York and adjoining states. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 12:02 pm
In State of Wash. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:42 am
United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:26 am
Here is the opinion in Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
They point to the tribal law stating that the Tribe has jurisdiction over the river and to the amount of the fine imposed against them. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:07 am
In the case of Pasqua Yaqui Tribe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:05 am
Tax Property taxes; fair market value [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 11:19 am
Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:24 pm
In a recent opinion, United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:18 am
In Catalyst Old River Hydroelectric Limited Partnership v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 9:37 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:54 am
Johnson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 5:22 pm
The Compact’s Article V provides for dividing the waters of the Tongue and Powder Rivers between Montana and Wyoming. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 10:50 am
Those of us that work in the community association industry have been closely following the path of the New Jersey case of Committee for a Better Twin Rivers v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:45 pm
United States and New Jersey v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 4:17 am
John's River Management District (see our summary here); and just this week, the Court heard oral argument in Horne v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:14 pm
The Utah Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in the case of HEAL Utah v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:55 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, in Detroit International Bridge Company v. [read post]