Search for: "Roberts v. Russell" Results 241 - 260 of 758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2019, 3:34 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court decision [last term in Janus v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Lucia v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 2:28 am
Robert Ehrlich, No. 96,797 (Russell)Direct appeal (petition for review)Patrick H. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Marty Lederman at Balkinization, Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker, Nicholas Bagley in The New York Times, Robert Schlesinger at U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure:  Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Heffernan v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court and also worked on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team, is leaving his post, according to the Justice Department. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for the Richmond Times-Dispatch, Keisha Russell weighs in on The American Legion v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am by Marissa Miller
This blog’s Lyle Denniston reports that Magner v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Medical Board's determination is conclusive if it is supported by some credible evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious" (Matter of Russell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 155 AD3d at 1046 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Drummond v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 98 AD3d 1116, 1117). [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Medical Board's determination is conclusive if it is supported by some credible evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious" (Matter of Russell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 155 AD3d at 1046 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Drummond v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 98 AD3d 1116, 1117). [read post]