Search for: "Staggers v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2021, 3:41 am
TULRCA also requires employers to notify the Secretary of State of the proposal, via form HR1. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:18 am
In his famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:19 am
Behrend and American Express Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:17 pm
OIP v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
The case that EPA would not wait for is Sackett v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:01 am
A recent Tax Court Summary Opinion, Bragg v. [read post]
Guest Post: In Rush to Invalidate Patents at Pleadings Stage, Are Courts Coloring Outside the Lines?
1 Jul 2015, 3:30 pm
United States, 683 F.3d 1102, 1108 (9th Cir. 2012); In re American Cont’l Corp. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Moreover, the harsh penalties contained in HB 1280 mean that the cost of being wrong is staggering. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:32 pm
In response to the panel, the CFPB states that it incorporated small business concerns, such as an exemption from new periodic statement requirements for certain small servicers. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
I figured it would be a good one, but the numbers were staggering. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:34 am
See, e.g., Borges v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:23 pm
(see Johnson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 9:08 am
The law's effect on the disproportionate number of African Americans in United States prisons is staggering. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:23 pm
Ct. at 1381, quoting United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
In Herrera v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:12 am
The narrative frame for the article is the ACLU's lawsuit, Presley v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:50 am
When I was a student, the first day of my “Administrative & Regulatory State” course featured discussion of a single case: Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
News: Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications, Final Submissions in Federal Treasurer’s defamation trial
18 Mar 2015, 1:31 am
See previous trial reports Collins opened his submissions by stating that while Fairfax was not seeking an adverse finding of credit against Hockey, his evidence was clearly “unsatisfactory”. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm
The court stated in its judgment that DMG relied in particular on Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75.In Jameel Lord Phillips MR stated [at 54]:“An abuse of process is of concern not merely to the parties but to the court. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:43 am
Our identification strategy exploits the staggered passage of anti-patent-troll laws at the state level. [read post]
