Search for: "State v. Bias" Results 241 - 260 of 4,580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 6:47 am
X did not leave to care for a family member and that he intended to abandon his lawful permanent resident status.The BIA considered case history on this issue, including Katebi v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:57 pm
However in this case the Court states, "Though the Federal Rules of Evidence do not specifically so state, prior misconduct of a witness which is probative of the bias of that witness may be proved by extrinsic evidence. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
  The BIA didn't discuss the materials that the petitioner submitted, instead relying on State Department country reports. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm by Elizabeth B. Carpenter
Kentucky 476 U.S. 79 (1986) Facts: When selecting a jury, both parties may remove potential jurors using an unlimited number of challenges for cause (e.g., stated reasons such as bias) and a limited number of peremptory challenges (i.e., do not need to state a reason). [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:38 am by Breakstone, White & Gluck
When asked by the judge if she could put aside that opinion and bias, the juror stated she did not think she could put it aside. [read post]