Search for: "State v. Harmon"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2020, 6:09 am
Of course, the Court’s decision in Romer v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:26 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am
Williams, Hassell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
The fact that a platform has some or a significant degree of sophistication (as it is for instance the case of YouTube) should not mean that the platform is not a mere facility.Watching Grey's Anatomy instead of studying (on a lawful copy of)Gray's AnatomyPrimary v secondary liability Fifthly (also this follows from point 3 above), the AG rejects the idea that secondary liability has now been absorbed within the harmonized primary liability regime. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide film producer… [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
A number of companies which own existing state of the art technology in this field are making their designs, drawings and instructions freely available and then well-known manufacturing companies are using parts and materials available in the UK supply chain to replicate the designs and increase the available production. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
(Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:10 am
In Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 12:34 pm
Harmonizing Board and D.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:57 am
V. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s the judgment of the FCA: York University v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 11:26 am
§1831d(a), which allows an FDIC-insured state bank to export to out-of-state borrowers the interest rate permitted by the state in which the state bank is located to its most favored lender, regardless of any contrary laws of such borrowers’ states. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 10:17 am
* Clarks v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
” That royalty is no pittance: In Hughes Aircraft v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
”All this said, the AG noted that the Enforcement Directive is [regrettably, I’d say] a measure of minimum harmonization. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:21 am
Here we continue our discussion of the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Piranha Partners et al. v. [read post]
