Search for: "State v. Atkins" Results 241 - 260 of 646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2015, 11:49 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And they're up to 4 law clerks/staff attorneys each.From the oral argument before the court Monday morning in Brumfield v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:16 am
We don't execute the mentally retarded in this country; this has been held to violate the Eighth Amendment as being cruel and unusual punishment in Atkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:09 am by Brian Evans
Supreme Court’s 2002 ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 8:16 am
In 2002, in Atkins v Virginia, theUS Supreme Court outlawed the execution of people withretardation. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am by Maureen Johnston
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:04 am
By Michael Hansen  On February 22, California State Assembly Member Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, introduced a bill, AB 1229, to restore the ability of California cities and counties to require affordable housing as part of market-rate housing developments. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
Dow argues that Texas has been openly flouting the Supreme Court’s 2002 decision in Atkins v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
Florida, in which the Court will consider whether Florida’s scheme for determining whether an inmate is intellectually disabled and therefore ineligible for the death penalty is consistent with its 2002 decision in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Levinnstim v Parker, 27 AD3d 698; see also Molina v State of New York, 46 AD3d 642; Williams v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 10 AD3d 653). [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 5:27 am by SHG
” In other words, he just made up his own rules for determining that a defendant was intellectually suited for death, since the Supreme Court's Atkins v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]