Search for: "State v. Sharp"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2020, 4:26 am
In R (Detention Action) v First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) [2015] EWCA Civ 840, the Court of Appeal declared that the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Rules 2014 (“the 2014 Rules”) (which were materially identical to the 2005 Rules) were ultra vires. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 5:34 am
United States, Nieves v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm
(Reservation Diminishment) and in Sharp Image Gaming, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
The AmeriKat hiding from work-relatedintruders in the Castello's gardenRight at the end of July, came big news from the Irish Supreme Court in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Clonmel Healthcare Ltd 2019 IESC 65. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 8:52 pm
Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
17 May 2014, 3:05 am
Board of Education, on the constitutionality of racial segregation in state school systems; and a memorandum on a federal case, Bolling v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:18 am
In Merck Sharpe & Dohme v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:15 am
The ambiguous and often tragic world of alleged and actual sex offenders - running the gamut from harmless experimentation and role-playing to sinister preying on defenseless victims - is brought into sharp relief in the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Sharp, by R.A. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:24 am
The case, Rutledge v Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, presents a challenge to the validity of state laws that regulate the reimbursements that pharmacies receive when they sell prescription drugs. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:22 am
CARSON v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
State, 714 P.2d 1176, 1180 (Wash. 1986) (en banc); Univ. of Minn. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:30 am
Represented by lawyers for the state, Chapman came to the Supreme Court last year, asking the justices to take up her case and weigh in on the question of immunity – including whether, in the wake of the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 9:19 am
In the recently decided Chadbourne & Parke v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:17 am
" The rule in that case, Jackson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 10:36 am
State, 772 N.E.2d 449, 456 (Ind. [read post]
