Search for: "State v. Sharp"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
17 May 2014, 3:05 am
Board of Education, on the constitutionality of racial segregation in state school systems; and a memorandum on a federal case, Bolling v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 8:52 pm
Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:18 am
In Merck Sharpe & Dohme v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:15 am
The ambiguous and often tragic world of alleged and actual sex offenders - running the gamut from harmless experimentation and role-playing to sinister preying on defenseless victims - is brought into sharp relief in the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Sharp, by R.A. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:24 am
The case, Rutledge v Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, presents a challenge to the validity of state laws that regulate the reimbursements that pharmacies receive when they sell prescription drugs. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:30 am
Represented by lawyers for the state, Chapman came to the Supreme Court last year, asking the justices to take up her case and weigh in on the question of immunity – including whether, in the wake of the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:22 am
CARSON v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
State, 714 P.2d 1176, 1180 (Wash. 1986) (en banc); Univ. of Minn. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
In Sharp v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm
The insurers promised, after Hurricane Andrew, to bring stability in prices and availability if states (including Florida and Texas, where I was commissioner) gave them the three things they demanded: much higher rates based on models, sharp cuts in coverage, such as deductibles, and pools (like Citizens) where they could dump high risks and keep profitable risks for themselves. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 9:19 am
In the recently decided Chadbourne & Parke v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:17 am
" The rule in that case, Jackson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 10:36 am
State, 772 N.E.2d 449, 456 (Ind. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 5:36 am
You have these dueling canons, and you have a rule that when the government sends somebody to jail for 10 years, it has to cross sharp corners. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:53 am
Supreme Court less recalled the stately self-image of the federal bench than the sharp-elbowed, much criticized retail politics most states use to elect their judges,” and that the “third-party advertising” deployed during the process “could trigger ethical concerns or even recusals at the Supreme Court if funders bring cases there. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
The latest decision from the NJ Appellate Division involving sex offenders, State v. [read post]
