Search for: "Still v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 45,241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2024, 2:53 am by SHG
While some in the past have argued that the corrupt grant of a pardon would be prosecutable, a contention of dubious merit to begin with, the question was put to rest with United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 12:53 pm by Guest Author
  If so, those crimes make Lopez removable from the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 7:53 am by Dan Farber
This treaty still provides the basis for international climate negotiations today. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:16 am by Adam Klasfeld
’” In making that finding, Mehta had quoted the Supreme Court’s strict test for incitement in the landmark case of Brandenberg v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:15 am by Dan Bressler
After years of ethical scandals surrounding the justices, there are still many open questions over when the justices need to recuse and how that decision is made. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 1:37 am by INFORRM
The Commission has contacted EU member states to trace any Bluesky offices within the region but has not reached out to the company directly. [read post]
30 Nov 2024, 2:29 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
30 Nov 2024, 6:49 am by Andy Gillin
The incident, which occurred on November 29, 2024, involved a red Lexus sedan striking a silver Honda CR-V before leaving the scene. [read post]
29 Nov 2024, 6:36 am by jonathanturley
The status imposes the higher standard first imposed in New York Times v. [read post]
28 Nov 2024, 5:58 am by Roel van Woudenberg
First, against the Opposition Division's decision that the (second) intervention of 2 March 2023 (cf. point V. above) was inadmissible. [read post]