Search for: "Stone v. People" Results 241 - 260 of 1,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:15 am by Andres
Update: Jas Purewal has informed me of a recent defamation case in England, G & G v Wikimedia Foundation. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Stone has long cultivated a public image as a dirty trickster on the edges of mainstream politics. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 8:18 pm by Michael Atkins
My talk focused on three main issues: pending legislative efforts to address foreign counterfeiters (including PIPA, SOPA, and OPEN), trademark bullying, and standards for online liability as reflected through Tiffany v. eBay and Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am by NL
The stone did not require repair. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am by NL
The stone did not require repair. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:37 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKTransportationCity's Bid to Evict Brick Firm From Brooklyn Rail Yard Not Pre-Empted Under ICC Termination Act Tri-State Brick and Stone of New York Inc. v. [read post]