Search for: "Sweeney v. Sweeney" Results 241 - 260 of 439
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm
Sweeney Miller, a firm on Watermill’s panel, were instructed: “Some time around the end of October 2006 Watermill sent Sweeney Miller an e-mail introducing Miss Scrowther and giving brief details of the transaction. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 4:29 am
"Sweeney noted the minority dissent "essentially agreed" with the argument he had made. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:04 am
However, Labor Law subdivisions 10 (professional educators) and 11 (non-professional educators) of §590.11 provide that such persons who are given a reasonable assurance of reemployment for the following school semester are ineligible for benefits if they are unemployed between successive semesters.For example, in Huff v Sweeney, Appellate Division, 222 A.D.2d 919, the Appellate Division ruled that teacher's aides who are provided with a reasonable assurance of… [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:10 am
However, Labor Law subdivisions 10 (professional educators) and 11 (non-professional educators) of §590.11 provide that such persons who are given a reasonable assurance of reemployment for the following school semester are ineligible for benefits if they are unemployed between successive semesters.For example, in Huff v Sweeney, Appellate Division, 222 A.D.2d 919, the Appellate Division ruled that teacher's aides who are provided with a reasonable assurance of… [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:25 am by Florian Mueller
That day is going to be (at least) doubly eventful from a FOSS Patents perspective as the Mannheim Regional Court will hold the first Ericsson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Comptroller's determination — finding that Breslin was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of a light-duty assignment — is supported by substantial evidence, it will not be disturbed (see Matter of Sweeney v DiNapoli, 88 AD3d 1051, 1051 [2011]; Matter of Murray v New York State Comptroller, 84 AD3d 1681, 1682-1683 [2011]; Matter of Pascale v DiNapoli, 84 AD3d at 1680; Matter of Roache v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 1036,… [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Judgment Burnett LJ (with whom Sweeney J agreed) noted the centrality of the principle of open justice to the rule of law [16]. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:32 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Tyler Court of Appeals addressed this issue in a 2007 opinion styled, Canal Insurance v. [read post]