Search for: "Turner v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2013, 10:40 am by admin
  On May 16th of 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana decided a lawsuit against Warner Bros. for the Clean Slate program in The Dark Knight Rises. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 10:40 am by Stone Law, P.C.
  On May 16th of 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana decided a lawsuit against Warner Bros. for the Clean Slate program in The Dark Knight Rises. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 10:40 am by admin
  On May 16th of 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana decided a lawsuit against Warner Bros. for the Clean Slate program in The Dark Knight Rises. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 10:40 am by admin
  On May 16th of 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana decided a lawsuit against Warner Bros. for the Clean Slate program in The Dark Knight Rises. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
Judicial NoticeDefendants request that the Court take judicial notice of documents that were filed in various collection lawsuits filed in King County Superior Court and in litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
5 May 2021, 6:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
id=1497436 12:45 – 1:00: Opening (Lillian Alvernaz, Indian Law Section Chair; James Taylor, Criminal Law Section Chair; Sam Alpert, State Bar of Montana)  1:00 – 2:45: The Death Penalty in State & Federal Courts Panelists: Michael Donahoe, Deputy Federal Defender, Federal Defenders of MontanaSK Rossi, Owner, Central House Strategies Gary Mitchell, AttorneySession Moderator: James Taylor, Managing Attorney, Tribal Prosecutors… [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 pm by chucknewton
"Any effort, action, or demand by a creditor to collect a pre-petition debt violates the automatic stay".Regardless of the stay violation, Paul Hill contended that he could not be sanctioned for his action of posting the sign because of his entitlement to exercise his free speech right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, citing Turner Advertising Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm by NL
Stockton on Tees Borough Council [2008] EWHC 2651 (Admin), and, decided after the Court of Appeal hearing in the present case, R (Turner and others) v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm by NL
Stockton on Tees Borough Council [2008] EWHC 2651 (Admin), and, decided after the Court of Appeal hearing in the present case, R (Turner and others) v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration ordecision of this motion.06-713 ) WASHINGTON STATE GRANGE V. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am by Charon QC
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling,  continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for  satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice  system with it. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am by Charon QC
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling,  continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for  satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice  system with it. [read post]