Search for: "United States v. Davis" Results 241 - 260 of 2,243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2019, 8:09 am
Just how remarkable it was becomes apparent when it is contrasted with a decision of the United States Supreme Court just a year later, Adderly v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:09 am by Christine Corcos
Just how remarkable it was becomes apparent when it is contrasted with a decision of the United States Supreme Court just a year later, Adderly v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 9:34 am by Keith Whittington
The Constitution famously does not say that the federal courts have the power of judicial review; it merely says that the "judicial Power of the United States" shall be vested in the Supreme Court and any inferior courts that Congress might create. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:18 am by Frank Heft
          In United States v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
In order to proceed in any individual capacity, a shareholder “must allege something more than wrong to the corporate body” (Davis v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States case) is a bit more complicated than might appear at first blush.Let’s start with a simple part: to the extent that the president was asserting that he could seek review of any impeachment proceedings directly in the Supreme Court before any lower court had looked at the matter, his assertion would run smack dab into the most venerable of Supreme Court rulings, the 1803 case of Marbury v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Vitale, “declaring that the state may not compel the recitation of a state-composed prayer in schools” Griffin v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]