Search for: "United States v. Curtis"
Results 241 - 260
of 370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am
Paul followed up his primer by posting a letter signed by several former high-level national security officials to Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) in opposition to the Senator’s proposals to halt the resettlement of Syrian refugees to the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:41 am
See Weaver v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The case is now pending before the United States Appeals Court for the Second Circuit. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm
Assistant to the Solicitor General Curtis Gannon will argue the case for the U.S. government. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:23 am
CNN, No. 0:22-cv-61842, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 8:16 pm
" Frederick Douglass, The Constitution of the United States: Is It Pro-Slavery or Anti-Slavery? [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Siegel v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
Take her opening in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:52 am
Michael Kent Curtis, No State Shall Abridge: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
Curtis and Edmund Wetmore, for appellant; F. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
"we're ashamed that the president of the United States is from Texas." [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm
After the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:53 am
Three new petitions granted Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
The resurgence of secularism: hostility towards religion in the United States and France. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Larsen v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 7:30 am
The legal point that building on another state’s continental shelf violates UNCLOS (to which, it is always worth noting, the United States is not a party) is arguably very important but strategically secondary. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
United States v. [read post]
