Search for: "United States v. Gonzales"
Results 241 - 260
of 656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2006, 3:50 pm
In other Public Defender news, the 9th Circuit blog has a post entitled "Gonzales: DOJ agrees Ninth Circuit precedent on minor offenses is flawed" and that the Department of Justice has conceded that the Ninth Circuit should grant rehearing en banc to correct United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:37 am
Petitioner Jose Angel Carachuri-Rosendo, a legal permanent resident of the United States, was convicted of two misdemeanor drug offenses in Texas: possession of a small amount of marijuana, followed by possession without a prescription of one anti-anxiety pill. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 8:29 am
[by Huang's lawyer]: So, sir, why did you come to the United States? [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
Gonzales , supra, at 37 (S calia, J., concurring in judgment) (quoting United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 2:24 pm
Raich, United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:18 pm
The second set includes writings from year 2007: the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:29 am
Gonzales, No. 05-76201, 2007 U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 11:12 am
The style of the case is Emma Gonzales v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
Brief for United States 47–48. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 11:33 am
It’s time to get the Supreme Court out of the business of overseeing the “national abortion control board” and to restore this sensitive and politically polarizing issue to the states and the people – where it has always belonged. *** Past cases linked to in this post: Gonzales v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 5:19 am
In his 1995 decision for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 10:16 pm
United States, Gall v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 11:00 am
In a case of first impression nationally, the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
First, the Court evaluated whether the de minimis doctrine is still good law in light of the United States Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Sandifer v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:30 pm
Texas, United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:03 pm
Presumably the power exists partly to balance out the power of prosecutors gone wild, especially when they have gone wild on officers trying to carry out the foreign policy of the United States, albeit by way of cooking up a stupid story (apparently). [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:51 pm
There was insufficient evidence that former Senator Pete V. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
United States, 649 A.2d 301, 308 (D.C. 1994); Carson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The 2006 RFRA Decision Holding That a Small Religious Group Has Rights to Use an Untested and Illegal Drug In 2006, in its first and only RFRA decision on the merits to date, the Supreme Court held in Gonzales v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 12:09 am
See U.S. v. bin Laden, 126 F. [read post]
