Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 241 - 260
of 9,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
-registered trademark may recover damages for uses of that trademark that occurred outside the United States and that were not likely to cause consumer confusion in the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
-registered trademark may recover damages for uses of that trademark that occurred outside the United States and that were not likely to cause consumer confusion in the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
This provision requires applicants to state that the trade mark is being used, or that the applicant has a bona fide intention to use the trade mark. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:37 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
We are discussing Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:55 pm
Fry Consulting Pty Ltd v Sports Warehouse Inc (No 2) [2012] FCA 81 Share on Facebook [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
See also United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:49 am
Jun. 19, 2018)JBT’s predecessor asserted Patent Act false marking claims, Lanham Act false advertising claims, and various North Carolina and Arkansas State law claims against Morris, its sole competitor in selling auger chillers to poultry processors in the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
One of the nice things about the being a Justice of the United States Supreme Court is that you never have to explain yourself. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm
United States being overruled. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:15 pm
March 27th marked six months in the United States without an execution. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
” United States v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:30 am
After remand from the Federal Circuit, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled that, due to the penal nature of the false marking statute, the appropriate penalty for marking a product with an incorrect or invalid patent number should be assessed at the maximum price the articles were sold, rather than the profit margin or economic benefit to the defendant. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:31 pm
The Georgia State University College of Law will hold a one-day symposium on Friday, October 23, 2009, to mark the tenth anniversary of the United States Supreme Court's integration mandate in Olmstead v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
As part of the rollback of environmental regulations, the Trump Administration has finally completed their longed for repeal of the 2015 definition of Waters of the United States (WOTUS). [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:17 pm
§292 or any other statute related to false marking or false advertising on behalf of the United States andlor the general public with regard to U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:05 am
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:35 am
The Board found this evidence to be substantial, but it concerned only recent years and lacked industry context, and the revenue figures were not limited to the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 3:40 am
" On the other hand, consumers would perceive respondent’s Red, White and Blue Fence Post Mark as referring to "the national colors of the United States of America, or the flag of the United States of America. [read post]
