Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Company"
Results 241 - 260
of 519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
The reasoning being that standard-form contracts are signed by consumers who have no right to negotiate its terms. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
Haynie v State, 468 Mich 302 (2003). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
The government has leased most of its mineral resources, including most of the Pinedale Field, to oil and gas companies (the Operators). [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:17 pm
That standard was most recent reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in MedImmune v Genentech, which stated: [Our cases] do not draw the brightest of lines between those declaratory-judgment actions that satisfy the case-or-controversy requirement and those that do not. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
United States 12-1092Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit erred when, in direc [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:45 am
EPA released the third edition of a report, Climate Change Indicators in the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Rowland-Shea and Mirza proposed that to remedy this problem, policymakers should prohibit leasing on low-potential lands, reform the federal oil and gas program, increase renewable energy on public lands, end oil and gas leasing altogether medium-term, and require oil companies to use or give up unused public leaseholds. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
., v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
Addressing the e-waste crisis: the need for comprehensive federal e-waste regulation within the United States. 14 Chapman L. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:39 am
A comparison of the number of amicus briefs filed shows where most of the attention was. 54 briefs in Oil States vs. only in SAS. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 4:43 am
United States, 976 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir.1992). [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 1:01 am
Indeed, the classic case of alleged predatory pricing, Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:40 am
Department of Revenue, State of Wyoming The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company; and Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co., LP v. [read post]
