Search for: "Ware v. Ware" Results 241 - 260 of 586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2008, 9:38 am
LEXIS 16924 (D DC, March 6, 2008), a D.C. federal district court transferred to the Eastern District of Texas an inmate's claim that federal prison authorities in Texas disrespected his Ifa faith through various actions.In Ware v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155 (Ch) told us that this required the global assessment so beloved of the Court of Justice, taking into account all the circumstances of the case. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 11:10 pm
It also concluded that no substantial burden was placed on plaintiff's free exercise of religion.In Wares v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am by Emily Coward
Waring that Batson doesn’t require a showing that an unlawful factor is the sole reason motivating a peremptory strike. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 195 F.2d 433, 436 (10th Cir.1952); see also, e.g., Ware v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:45 pm
In the 5th Circuit's March 3, 2006, decision in Graves v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 9:04 am by Karel Frielink
Me on the left… Click here to learn more about the 2D S/V Osprey Explorer and click here to learn more about reflection seismology. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
EDT, the Law Library of Congress will host its Constitution Day event, a discussion by University at Buffalo School of Law Professor Samantha Barbas of her book Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
The latest chapter of the “Brand Owners v Counterfeiters” saga seems again to be playing out in favour of brand owners, with last week’s decision of a Paris District Court holding eBay responsible for facilitating the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton products. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 3:42 pm by Stuart Kaplow
§6901, establishes a rebuttable presumption that any goods, wares, articles, and merchandise mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China, where the U.S. government says China is committing genocide against the Uyghur people, or produced by an entity on a list required by clause (i), (ii), (iv) or (v) of section 2(d)(2)(B) are prohibited under section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 are not… [read post]