Search for: "Wells v. Lloyd" Results 241 - 260 of 646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2010, 5:38 am by Adam Wagner
This is in the interests of public protection and therefore well within the exceptions built into Article 8 of the European Convention. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
(The incurious Supreme Court, both majority and dissent, was oblivious to this fact as well as the extensive regulation of asbestos-containing products by the federal government.) [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:05 am by David Lat
This isn’t a legal argument, but a moral one, as well as a public-relations point. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 10:44 am
Music Trading Online loses its appealOn Friday the Court of Appeal (Mummery, Rix and Lloyd LJJ) gave its ruling in Independiente Ltd and others v Music Trading Online (HK) Ltd, in which MTO appealed against the judgment of Mr Justice Underhill (see IPKat post here) that Independiente was entitled to sue MTO for breach of contract after that company breached its undertakings in a settlement agreement that it would not sell infringing CDs and DVDs online, and not just for contempt of… [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 11:07 pm
Nigel is taking up a newly created role of Head of Technology at Olswang.The IPKat wishes Nigel well in his new position. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:15 am by Jeb Clulow and Catriona Casha
 The subject incorporation clause wording was found by the Tribunal to be “almost identical” to the wording of the clause in the well-known Court of Appeal decision in the Strathnewton (D/S A/S Idaho v Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am by Vercammen Law
Harwood Lloyd, LLC130 Main StreetHackensack, NJ 07601Counsel for Defendant, Nicholas MandorloDaniel J. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 10:16 am by Giles Peaker
Lloyd v North & Ors (2023) EWHC 1497 (KB) A renewed application for permission to appeal a first instance refusal to set aside the strike out of Ms Lloyd’s claim for compensation for eviction, which claim was issued after the Court of Appeal had refused Ms L’s application for permission to appeal a county court appeal decision granting a possession order against her. [read post]