Search for: "King v. State" Results 2581 - 2600 of 5,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2010, 8:31 am
  Moreover, the instant action is distinguishable from Zizerski v Life Quality Motor Sales, NYLJ October 27, 2008, Kings County. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:53 am by Matthew Nelson
The Department of Labor and Economic Growth filed an application for rehearing in King v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:26 pm
Secretary of State for Defence AnthologyAntonio Cassese & Gabriel Bach, Eichmann: Is Evil So Banal? [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Colangelo writes about Gamble v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
He also stated that [Siegel] filed a police report with the Kings County District Attorney's Bureau of Investigation in January 2014, but no criminal charges were ever filed, and there was never any basis for [Siegel] to file such a police report against him.Martin v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In 2006, in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, Banushi! [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
The court began its opinion by explaining that "on the night of July 3–4, 2010," four police officers, all members of the youth violence strike force, were in plain clothes in an unmarked vehicle patrolling Martin Luther King Boulevard in the Roxbury neighborhood of Boston. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hamilton Textiles v Estate of Mate, 269 AD2d 214 [2000]; Estate of Burke v Repetti & Co., 255 AD2d 483 [1998]). [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am by NCC Staff
Amy Coney Barrett’s Judicial Philosophy Doesn’t Hold Up to Scrutiny By Angus King Jr., United States Senator, Maine and Heather Cox Richardson, Professor of History, Boston College Angus King Jr. and Heather Cox Richardson argue against originalism—the method of legal interpretation that favors interpreting the Constitution or laws based strictly on their original meaning—and for an interpretative philosophy that looks to the ideals and intent of… [read post]