Search for: "Long v State" Results 2581 - 2600 of 45,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 10 provides that all documents submitted by the Requesting State shall be translated into the language of the Requested State. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 9:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
I stress this history, for the principle that the majority today invokes was long ago discarded. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:18 pm by Jeff Gittins
Last week, the Utah Supreme Court issued its opinion in Delta Canal Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 3:06 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States:  Sentence reduction due to retroactive amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines17-312 United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:59 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
In this case, the relevant national rule is the Immigration Act 1971, s 11(1), which provides that a person who has not otherwise entered the UK shall be deemed not to do so as long as he is detained, or temporarily admitted or released while liable to detention, under the powers conferred by Schedule 2 to the Act. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:22 am by info
There is no clearly established public policy requiring employers to refrain from demanding that their adult employees work long hours, nor is any public policy directly served by employee’s refusal to work long hours. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 12:21 pm
 You can file your state claims in state court if you want, as long as the federal claims get filed where they belong. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
The best that you could possibly hope for anyway is to somehow prevail in state court (which ain't gonna happen) and then have that decision summarily reversed by the Supreme Court in a blistering opinion.But as it is, as expected, you lose -- consistently -- long before that, including but not limited to in today's published opinion by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:59 am by nflatow
A 7-2 decision in favor of the prisoner in a third case, Martinez v. [read post]