Search for: "State v. Wells"
Results 2581 - 2600
of 67,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2014, 2:53 pm
Supreme Court decision in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 12:34 pm
Saesee v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 3:01 am
It is now styled as Florida Workers' Advocates v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm
Well, in 1968, the Supreme Court in Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:41 pm
In New York v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
In Birchfield v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 9:41 am
Rumsfeld discussed the government interest in the opening of Part III of the opinion, which was necessary given that the expressive conduct section applied United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
The news has been full of stories about the far reaching decision made by the Supreme Court of the United States, or SCOTUS, in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:55 pm
On September 9, the Ninth Circuit ruled that Washington State social workers are not “learned professionals” exempt from FLSA overtime pay requirements, despite “rigorous” educational and training requirements for the positions (Solis v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:08 am
On September 9, the Ninth Circuit ruled that Washington State social workers are not “learned professionals” exempt from FLSA overtime pay requirements, despite “rigorous” educational and training requirements for the positions (Solis v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:58 am
State v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 11:02 am
The Supreme Court is to hear oral arguments in KSR v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:48 pm
ShareOn Friday the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
My post mentioned the ramifications for PAGA actions, but these further ramifications are worth considering as well if you are handling a case in which the state enforcement agencies have expressed interest. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:25 pm
Paul.In Part III, we take head-on the argument that the "crush video" case, United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:00 am
Supreme Court denied the County's motion and confirmed the arbitrator’s decision against the County, sustaining the arbitrator's award of $27,049.20 against Nassau.The Appellate Division subsequently rejected the County’s appeal of the Supreme Court's ruling.The court said that an arbitration award violates public policy “only where a court can conclude, without engaging in any extended fact-finding or legal analysis, that a law prohibits the particular matters to be… [read post]
