Search for: "Stephens v. State"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 6,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2013, 9:23 am
The holding in Gideon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
Today’s lone case for argument, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
The state points to the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Locke v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:03 am
Navarette v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:03 am
Read Opinion: Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
The Court ruled 6-3 in King v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 8:24 am
But Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (joined by Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor) filed a concurrence stating that the issue should be reviewed when presented outside the AEDPA context. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:08 am
Naked Cowboy v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm
Three dissenting Justices (Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and David Souter) argued that the law burdened many voters, and it was not justified by any state interest, given that the state failed to prove the law was necessary to prevent voter fraud or promote public confidence in the election process. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Faces $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Over Voting Machine Fraud Claims”. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 7:04 pm
The 55-page ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
(That "standard" was set by the Supreme Court in Caeteno v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am
This is true of both Oil States Energy Services. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:23 pm
United States This week the Supreme Court heard arguments in one of the big cases of the term, Arizona v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:05 am
Eisenstadt, Enemy and Ally: Religion in Loving v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:40 am
On March 4, 2014, Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the Supreme Court's opinion in Law v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 6:57 pm
As stated in White v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 6:48 pm
Language scientists have made great strides in the past quarter-Century, but legal professionals are only now waking-up to the importance of this language tool.In People v Harris, Justices Zahra and Stephen Markman both used corpus linguistics in opposing opinions to address a legal question involving whether a police officer's false statement is nevertheless protected within the scope of a Michigan law that procribes a police officer’s involuntary statement from… [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:00 am
Stephen M. [read post]
