Search for: "The People v. English"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 2,893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2007, 10:04 am
English common law, on the other hand, has not yet elaborated the role of fundamental rights, protected by the ECHR and given effect through the Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Since the Supreme Court of Canada decided Rocket v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:41 am
Wilson, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 7:34 pm
(EcuRed, Letra del Año)).The object of the annual letter is to provide guidance for the nation and its people, as well as more technical advice for the orisha communities of initiates and believers. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
They were popular domestic terrorists even though responsible for, more than 200 bombings and dozens of robberies between 1963 and 1970 that left six people dead, and the kidnapping of the British trade commissioner, and the kidnapping and murder of a Quebec government cabinet minister. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:28 am
The People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
In People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:01 am
Part II consists of papers by Osofsky on Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
I’ve just finished reading the fascinating case of AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) via the IP Osgoode blog. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
Here is self-professed textualist Justice Kavanaugh arguing that the words "because of sex" do not cover sexual orientation in Title VII:Most everyone familiar with the use of the English language in America understands that the ordinary meaning of sexual orientation discrimination is distinct from the ordinary meaning of sex discrimination. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 8:08 am
Over the last several years I have been considering the issue of corruption generally, --Soft Extra Territorialism and American Anti-Corruption Campaigns, Sept. 12, 2006; --Soft Extra Territorialism and Anti-Corruption Campaigns: On the Perverse Folly of Corrupt States, Sept. 15, 2006);--Rockwell International v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
Pa. 2008); Colon v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 6:25 pm
Reporting in Spanish and English follow, with details of both the event and of the context which gave rise to it. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
Lord Acton (1834-1902), the English historian, famously said that “power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:01 pm
According to CNET at least two class actions have already been filed in the Californian courts, including one (Thomson v. [read post]
