Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 7,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 5:49 am
The prior decision remains controlling authority unless an inconsistent decision of the United States Supreme Court requires modification of the decision or this Court sitting en banc overrules the prior decision. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 1:49 pm
By Seth Parent In Doe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 2/26/10Cite: Viad Corp. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:10 pm
The United States basically says, people. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:26 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:40 am
The court noted that '(a)lthough minor, (spitting) is an application of force to the body of the victim, a bodily contact highly offensive...' 183 Misc2d at 834, citing United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:33 am
Events in France and the United Kingdom illustrate the common grammar of Traveller/Roma exclusion within Ireland and other European states. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 1:46 pm
The panel decision is United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:39 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 1:36 am
On June 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 6:11 pm
” ACCA will hear oral argument on Thursday at 1000 in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:18 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 11:23 am
Such a non-categorical approach was recently used by the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
” [17] Russian Law against “Gay Propaganda” among minors At the end of 2011, the State Duma (the lower house of the Federal Assembly of Russia) started discussing the need to create a new federal law regarding “Gay Propaganda” among minors as it could cause harm to their health and development. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:16 pm
United States, 277 U.S. 438, 478 (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting). [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
During the oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
Thuraissigiam is from Sri Lanka and is Tamil, an ethnic minority in Sri Lanka. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
The California Supreme Court doesn't feel that issue's sufficiently important to grant review.But the United States Supreme Court does. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:19 am
That is the question before the Court this morning in the case of James Castleman, in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 5:12 am
United States, the Supreme Court indicated both that it was undertaking a major revision, essentially an abolition, of the exclusionary rule and at other times, including in it's stated holding, suggested that it was only reducing the rule's force in a minor way. [read post]
