Search for: "Deputy v. State"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 5,002
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2020, 10:10 am
Sharp v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:29 pm
This event will focus on the OHIM Community trade mark opposition decision in CANAL + v KABLEPLUS of 13 February 2014, where an opponent was put to proof of use of a mark which was not the basis of his opposition. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 2:40 pm
Burke III and Elizabeth V. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:11 am
DELACASTRO v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 10:11 am
In December, the justices heard argument in Moore v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:50 am
Arguing for the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Edwin Kneedler again defended the constitutionality of Section 16(b), as he had in January. [read post]
14 May 2022, 8:30 am
"); State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm
(reprinted with permission from Lyle Denniston Law News) The argument in Dollar General v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:27 am
Deputy Solicitor General Edwin S. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:21 pm
In the case of People V. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:21 pm
In the case of People V. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:21 pm
In the case of People V. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 1:23 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Salim v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:25 am
Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.Halbig v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 3:08 am
The granted issue in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, argued next on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of petitioner. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The court also found that the information was exempt from disclosure under the cybersecurity exemption, noting that the Court of Appeals has explained that although FOIL is "'liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted'" to achieve its legislative purpose of maximizing public access to government records, "Courts must give an exemption its "natural and obvious meaning where such interpretation is consistent with the legislative intent and with the… [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The court also found that the information was exempt from disclosure under the cybersecurity exemption, noting that the Court of Appeals has explained that although FOIL is "'liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted'" to achieve its legislative purpose of maximizing public access to government records, "Courts must give an exemption its "natural and obvious meaning where such interpretation is consistent with the legislative intent and with the… [read post]
