Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 3,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2009, 2:27 pm
., v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
A member of the military forces of the United States or of any state of the United States in the performance of official duties; or 3. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
First, the administration contends that the United States is in a state of armed conflict with Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm
Judge Susan Illston stated this was not a problem because the court could "group[] similar state laws together and apply[] them as a unit. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:45 am
If the examination standards in the United States were not changing, we might expect successful applications in the United States by US inventors to grow at about the same rate as our measure of internationally important inventions originating in the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:10 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Respondents, Fed. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
Otherwise, the royalty base must be limited to the “smallest saleable unit. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:54 am
Chicago, the first employment law case of this term, and Holder v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
The Federalists believed that the people were for them, but that the holders of state office would oppose them. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:13 pm
& Loan Assn. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
United States, 16-7314. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:10 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:31 am
Holder, the plaintiff, a subdivision of Austin, Texas, sued the United States, arguing that Section 5 exceeds the scope of Congress's authority to enforce the 15th Amendment. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:36 pm
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, ELECTIONS Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
United States 12-1185Issue: Whether, in light of the plain meaning of “threat” and the constitutional rule of Virginia v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:36 pm
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, ELECTIONS Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm
Kaersvang: Marbury v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:35 pm
In a case decided in 1942, United States v. [read post]
