Search for: "State v. L----R"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 3,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am
R v Peacock: Michael Peacock was charged under the Obscene Publications Act 1959. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 8:16 am
Prof’l Conduct R. 1.6 (eff. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
R. 27.4 and 3rd Cir. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:03 am
L. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
Jack R. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Woolard, Jr., Chair Professor of Law Director of the John L. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
LAMMERTSE, MARY L. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
The European court held that there had been no such violation. 39 As the European court’s judgment in the Karakó case itself shows, in Petrina v Romania (Application No 78060/01) (unreported), given 14 October 2008, the court had confirmed, at para 19, that the right to protection of reputation is a right which, as an element of private life, falls within the scope of article 8 (“le droit à la… [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:22 pm
L. [read post]
Dismantling Torts: Justice Stone's distress about Texas Supreme Court's Anti-plaintiff Jurisprudence
19 Aug 2008, 10:03 pm
Draker v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
R. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
See L. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 8:07 pm
Pataki, (Docket Nos. 96-6249(L) and 96-6269). [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
ShawAdam R. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:22 pm
Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) said that the Obama administration has not sought additional authorities concerning the U.S. effort against ISIS and that current actions being considered against the group would not require further legal authority. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the US Supreme Court’s decision in the Jack Daniel’s v VIP IP dispute. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:46 am
What’s the relevance of the economist v. legal scholars? [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 3:08 am
R. [read post]
