Search for: "United States v. Am" Results 2621 - 2640 of 7,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2015, 7:32 am by Florian Mueller
Ten days ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted summary affirmance (i.e., summary judgment at the appellate stage) of Judge Koh's decision to let Apple collect $450 million from Samsung (against a bond posted years ago) even though one of the patents underlying the related ruling had been held invalid by an in-house court (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Under the TCPA, it is `unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States -- (A) to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using any automatic telephone dialing system . . . [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm by Morris Turek
  Here is a picture of the front entrance of the store: Anyway, to the surprise of not a single trademark attorney, Dirt Cheap recently filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Cheap Cheap in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (Case No. 4:10-cv-01198), alleging that the CHEAP CHEAP trademark is likely to cause confusion with Dirt Cheap’s registered DIRT CHEAP and FUN FUN CHEAP CHEAP trademarks. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 11:15 pm
Harlan worries that the amount under guidelines will set off an appeal in the Second Circuit.Harlan is right back to us on Saturday morning with this post concerning whether the Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Although the Republican governor of Texas ordered his own state guard to “monitor” the U.S. military while it is in his state (which is, of course, still one of the fifty united states that our armed forces protect), and even though the reliably unhinged Rep. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Echoing arguments by Theda Skocpol on Civil War pensions, DPADR argues that the various forms of debt relief offered by 19th-century state legislatures constituted a sort of proto-welfare state. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:28 am by Scott Riddle
See also Golden Door (declining to apply §201(c)(2) but finding ethical violations); United Realty Advisors, LP v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Court, applying Georgia law, entered its opinion in the case based on questions certified from the United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
On the other hand, I’ve seen other appellate opinions do the same thing (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Jeanine Cali
Last year, he argued before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Davis v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:27 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] For example, read the #LadyLawyerDiaries. [read post]