Search for: "MILES v. STATE"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 3,930
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2014, 8:00 am
Miles and Andrew B. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
Swap the non-distinctive words and add a house mark: not enough to avoid conflictWEALTHSMART v UBS SMARTWEALTH O/094/18 UK opposition (February 2018)For those involved in brand clearance, this is an illustration of the state of the Thomson Life principle in action before the UKIPO. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 4:38 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2024, 4:45 am
In DeLacey v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm
Supreme Court's decision in K Mart Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
Anderson talk about the case of Trump v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
” The case, Solid 21 Inc. v Hublot of America, et al. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 2:31 am
He quoted Judge Newman of the Second Circuit, who stated that factual copying and actionable copying are not coextensive concepts. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:19 pm
Sadly, since 2022’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:44 am
At issue was a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges to a hospital within thirty miles, an Act that was almost an exact replica of a law the Court struck down in 2016 (in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am
According to a Pentagon spokesman, however, the bombers did not come within the twelve-mile zone surrounding any of the reclaimed islands. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 10:40 am
(Peters v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 2:04 pm
” See Stewart v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:46 pm
As Richard Epstein explained some years ago in connection with the Supreme Court's decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:35 am
In Shirley v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:15 pm
Ted Frank has a good round up of analysis on the potential problems spots at Point of Law; And Howard Erichson reports on a plaintiffs-only conference to discuss the settlement;From the miscellaneous category: New York State practitioners should take note of a reversal in Raffellini v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 6:56 am
State police are still investigating exactly what happened, but the truck hit the first car, a Honda CR-V, hard enough to flip it onto its roof. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:36 am
It’s uncharted territory, but I seriously doubt that pervasive and persistent surveillance of that nature comports with the Fourth Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
