Search for: "People v. House" Results 2641 - 2660 of 11,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2023, 11:49 am by Ilya Somin
" Her endorsement of a relatively narrow definition of "public use" that excludes private "economic development" takings is at odds with her opinion for the Court in Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:45 am
  Before these people died in 2017, they were among the 34,000 people housed in Arizona’s state prisons who are completely dependent upon the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADC) and its for-profit contractor, Corizon Health, for all medical and mental health care. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:35 am by Jessica Arons
Let’s be clear: these laws do nothing to address the ableism people with disabilities face — or the discrimination against any marginalized group — in education, housing, and health care. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 9:02 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In the abortion area, things are a little different in that, under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
The Court also heard oral argument Wednesday in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 7:42 pm
The house was wide open and people were traveling in and out of the residence, carrying bags of unknown property and articles of clothing.' PSOF, Exh. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 10:53 am by Nina Perales
After the 2000 census, North Carolina won the 435th seat in the House of Representatives because it beat out Utah by 856 people. [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:25 pm by ACLU
At first, few people knew about the ACLU and many who did, despised us. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The proposed Idaho Memorial (which would need to be approved on the floor of both houses of the state legislature before it would take effect) provides in part: We, your Memorialists, the House of Representatives and the Senate of the State of Idaho assembled in the First Regular Session of the Sixty-eighth Idaho Legislature, do hereby respectfully represent that: WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Obergefell v. [read post]