Search for: "Powers v. State"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 37,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2011, 6:06 am
The question for the Court in M.B.Z. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:15 am
Since its 1943 decision Parker v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:07 pm
Perhaps discussion of the November 30, 2009, opinion by the United States Supreme Court in Porter v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:09 pm
" Henson v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 2:00 am
It went on to apply the legal doctrine of contra proferentem—a long-settled principle of state contract law that ambiguities in contracts be construed against the drafter, particularly where that party has greater bargaining power. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am
According to the civil liberties group:The government relies on a 1979 case, Smith v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:50 am
Nelson accuses the panel of adopting broad supervisory power over the state court rather than the narrow legal standard of deference under AEDPA. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:56 am
In Mendez, Jr. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
This one’s very simple and straightforward: become President of the United States. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:17 am
” * Article V, §2 of the State's Constitution provides that "There shall be not more than twenty civil departments in the state government, including those referred to in this constitution. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:30 pm
The decision in NCAA v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:07 am
The Direction was therefore ultra vires (i.e. outside the Secretary of State’s power). [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 8:11 pm
The power of federal district courts was reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in two decisions delivered yesterday. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:26 pm
Eventually, the Court created a limited exception for corporations to be considered citizens of the states where they were incorporated; an exception Congress later codified and expanded to include the states where the principal place of business was located. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 2:49 am
The case, Timbs v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:19 pm
The trouble with these arguments is that they turn on the limitations on the commerce power that the Court invented in NFIB v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm
As to Miller’s position that Congress has not authorized Mueller’s work by statute, the court simply pointed to United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
All of the opinions in NFIB v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 9:41 am
Rumsfeld discussed the government interest in the opening of Part III of the opinion, which was necessary given that the expressive conduct section applied United States v. [read post]
