Search for: "State v. Waters"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 9,937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2012, 7:02 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Does this mean, as ruled in the Physical Research Laboratory v K.G. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Does this mean, as ruled in the Physical Research Laboratory v K.G. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
Tucker Higgins reports at CNBC on friend-of-the-court briefs filed in support of the city in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 9:11 am
[cite to Bland v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:31 am
Although the Plaintiff admittedly could not state how long the water was located on the lobby floor, she did offer evidence of the official weather reports confirming that snow and freezing rain fell over the 24 hours leading up to the event. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:22 am
The States are invoking their right, recognized by the Supreme Court more than a century ago, to seek relief in federal court when polluters in other jurisdictions send dangerous air or water pollution across state lines. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am
Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 12:03 am
"Accretion" was defined by the Supreme Court of the Kingdom of Hawaii as: Land formed by alluvion, or the gradual and imperceptible accretion from the water, and land gained by reliction, or the gradual and imperceptible recession of the water, belong to the owner of the contiguous land to which the addition is made.Halstead v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:59 pm
The Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Arizona v California gave the Secretary the right to reduce different states’ allotments to river water based upon drought conditions. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 5:54 am
Lamott (Violence Against Women Act)United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
In Brogan v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:56 am
However, in Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:05 pm
Attorney's Office has once again filed court papers trying to reopen the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Michigan v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
They involve construction litigation, water intrusion litigation and of course, mortgage law litigation. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 9:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 7:51 am
In Metra Industries Inc. v. [read post]
