Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 4,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
V. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC argues that the proposed acquisition would result in “substantial effects on employment wages, benefits and conditions for people who work for or seek employment from the parties and their brands. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
I’m willing to bet that, if I gave every one of you a piece of paper and a pencil and asked you to make your own list of ten, no two people would emerge with the same list. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:42 am
Mattocks v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
Metaphysics: Toney v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 5:56 am
Example: bot priced a book at $23 million on Amazon because it got into an interaction with another bot bidding up the price. [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 5:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:50 am
Case citation: Bell v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:37 am
3d 540 (6th Cir. 2021) (upholding Kentucky's price-gouging law as applied to sales on Amazon.com); SPGGC, LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm
Joe Touro, Annenberg School: heard rumors that Google is starting to desilo its data: Gmail v. contextual marketing etc. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:35 pm
The Agricultural Adjustment Act, famously upheld by the Supreme Court in Wickard v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 3:47 am
In an effort to break the logjam, progressive advocacy group Demand Justice is planning a social media ad campaign on Monday that targets about 100,000 people around Washington, DC, arguing the court must hear the president’s financial records cases, collectively referred to as Trump v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm
The income tax is a direct tax because it falls directly on people. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 11:42 am
Zhang v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 1:03 am
Indeed, as we know from Midland Heart v Richardson [2008] L. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In Price v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am
NFIB v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
Mr Malivoire disagreed with this, since that group would include people who did not rent cars, and Mr Phillips was not called. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
**Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
