Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 9,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2007, 3:46 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
As it also explains, most state courts in the United States are courts of “general” jurisdiction, which means they can hear “any case over which no other tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 1:54 pm
Archives: United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2024, 6:45 am
The United Kingdom Supreme Court began hearing a legal challenge centered on the definition of “woman” on Tuesday, marking the latest development in a long-running dispute between a women’s rights campaign group and the Scottish government. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:33 pm
United States, 133 F.3d 897, 902 (Fed. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
Barrett v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:29 am
Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:37 pm
Ceballos, the United States Supreme Court held that a government employee's speech made in a official capacity was not protected under the First Amendment. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
and that Coley's use of the mark was without due cause. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:53 am
Quirk, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am
Vinter and others v United Kingdom (application nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10) – read judgment The Strasbourg Court has found three British murderers’ imprisonment for life is not inhuman or degrading and therefore not in violation of Article 3. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
It is currently unknown whether Rheingold will file a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 5:23 pm
Democratic Senator Mark Warner has introduced a bill, S.1642, that would override the Second Circuit’s decision in Madden v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 2:59 pm
On April 20, 2006 the Applicant filed a trademark application for NATIONSTAR pro se with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:33 am
" United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 2:43 pm
Gardner v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 8:21 am
Citigroup, Inc., et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit clarified the limits of bankruptcy court jurisdiction over class actions. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
