Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
United States, which stems from the federal government’s failure to fully reimburse health insurance companies for losses created as a result of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:58 am
Section 2 of the Lanham Act empowers the PTO to deny or cancel a mark’s registration, and thus control what appears on the Principal Register, on a number of grounds, including [besides the prohibition on disparaging marks] any mark that: (b) Consists of or comprises the flag or coat of arms or other insignia of the United States, or of any State or municipality, or of any foreign nation, or any simulation thereof; (c) Consists of or… [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 2:55 pm
"Citizen of the United states. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
When the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision Riley v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm
The rule also includes “Waters and Features That are Not Waters of the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 6:56 pm
The rule also includes “Waters and Features That are Not Waters of the United States. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:52 am
Star Borough v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rendered judgment last year, overturning the district court’s finding that the red soles could not be trademarked. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:34 pm
We expect that Midland Funding will file a certiorari petition in the United States Supreme Court on November 10. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:35 pm
The Court also rejected the EUIPO’s argument that, if Indo’s opposition were successful, the opposed mark could be converted into national applications in all (remaining) EU Member States. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 8:14 am
It read, in part: That the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby authorized to issue, on the credit of the United States, one hundred and fifty millions of dollars of United States notes, not bearing interest, payable to bearer, at the Treasury of the United States, and of Denominations, such denominations as he may deem expedient, not less than five dollars each. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:04 pm
By Peter Montine The case of United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:05 pm
Mark Alembik) for malpractice. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Unfortunately, automobile accidents injure a number of children in Florida and throughout the United States each year. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 8:37 am
Facts: This case (US v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Unfortunately, automobile accidents injure a number of children in Florida and throughout the United States each year. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
On Wednesday, April 22, in Ricci v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 2:26 am
AereoKiller, LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, No. 15-56420, 21 March 2017Kluwer Copyright Blog updates on the ruling that reversed the decision of the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:56 am
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida declared the ACPA damages should be reduced as duplicative of the service mark damages. [read post]
