Search for: "Cooper v. United States"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 3,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
@The Appellate Division observed that the ICPC, codified in Social Services Law '374Ba, is a statutory agreement with the express purpose of fostering cooperation and communication between all 50 states so that children requiring placement in another state Ashall receive the maximum opportunity to be placed in a suitable environment and with persons or institutions having appropriate qualifications and facilities to provide a necessary and desirable degree and type of… [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:25 am
Blanchard, et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:25 am
Blanchard, et al. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:02 pm
Even if other nations initially viewed the Italian model with suspicion, it has since become a blueprint for many European nations and the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am
Press Oct., 2013) Katrina Kimport, Queering Marriage: Challenging Family Formation in the United States (Rutgers U. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 3:09 am
Let me suggest, however, that the Department of Justice, and then the United States Supreme Court, explicitly refused to place the CRA into a genuinely transformative framework. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:41 pm
There have been eight Actos Bladder Cancer trials to date across the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:07 am
United States , 517 U.S. 748, 755 (1996). [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:07 am
United States, 517 U.S. 748, 755 (1996). [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
Two current actions in the United States serve as useful illustrations. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
The first, United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
SE v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:13 am
” The district court’s reasoning chiefly rested on the general presumption against strict liability, to its reading of this statute, and to its reading of past precedents interpreting similar statutes; based on this, the court was willing to reject an out-of-circuit court of appeals precedent, United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:48 am
Based on the foregoing, David Goldstein commenced an action against the respondent, on or about December 20, 2006, entitled Goldstein v Gold, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, under Index No. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:35 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
With Monday’s oral arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 11:54 pm
In the AAUP, we encounter such violations, petty and large, on a daily basis in the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 11:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 4:57 pm
South AfricaQwelane v. [read post]
