Search for: "F. v. R." Results 2661 - 2680 of 20,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
NYCHA can hardly fault F&F for attempting to intervene in the JV action, when it was NYCHA who first tried to use the JV order to preclude F&F's claims in the CL action. [read post]
Even so, the Court went on, in obiter, to declare that the well-known test in R v Ghosh [1982] EWCA Crim 2 should no longer represent the law. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am by DARRYL HUTCHEON, MATRIX
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]