Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 2661 - 2680 of 6,398
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:39 am by Kirk Jenkins
Four years later, the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm by Bexis
  See also Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 12:42 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeNo Attorney-Client Privilege Found For Worker's Talks With KPMG Lawyers United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 12:06 am by John Mikhail
Bank of the United States (1824), where Marshall for the first time made clear that his entire opinion in McCulloch was “founded on, and sustained by, the idea that the bank is an instrument which is ‘necessary and proper for carrying into effect the powers vested in the government of the United States’” (9 Wheat. at 860). [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 2:59 pm by Nikki Siesel
On April 20, 2006 the Applicant filed a trademark application for NATIONSTAR pro se with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
This expansive language would likely chill a wide range of political activity in the United States directed at the Israeli government — activity that is constitutionally protected, regardless whether members of Congress agree with it. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Among the reasons frequently cited for the higher incidence of litigation in the United States compared to the rest of the world is the acceptability of contingent fees for plaintiffs’ counsel and general rules that each party to a lawsuit in the U.S. bears its own costs. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The aftermath of the war did not produce a new constitutionalism so much as a reconsideration of the old, as President Madison reversed his former opposition to Alexander Hamilton’s 1791 Bank of the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm by Cicely Wilson
United States, United States Supreme Court (1/13/15)Criminal LawWhitfield, fleeing a botched bank robbery, entered 79-year-old Parnell’s home and guided her from a hallway to a room a few feet away, where she suffered a fatal heart attack. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Hamilton Bank (1985), requiring property owners to seek compensation in state court under state law before going to federal court. 06-1501, Williams v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In 2015, Congress enacted the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act (34 USC§ 20144) which establishes the Fund to provide compensation to certain people who are injured in or by acts of international state-sponsored terrorism, and who obtain a judgment issued by a United States district court under state or federal law against a foreign state that was designated as a state sponsor of… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:52 am by Conor McEvily
Delia and United States v. [read post]