Search for: "State v. Person"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 76,028
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2016, 4:31 pm
On 19 January 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (on application of Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:56 am
Aguiniga v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Reece v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
” The Court wrote, quoting the State Supreme Court’s 1980 decision in Bishop v. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am
This is whether the doctrine forms part of procedural or of substantive law.If it is essentially a rule of substantive law, it negatives any ‘rights and obligations’ that private persons might otherwise hold in relation to the validity of acts of foreign states, i.e. the rights which such persons may claim to have been violated by a foreign state. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:37 pm
That the primary thrust of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(c) is not to interdict speech, but rather conduct, is reinforced in State v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:51 am
There were no personal injury related appellate opinions this week in state or federal court in Maryland this week but there are a few cases elsewhere worth a read: In Morse v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
Law Lessons from State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:14 am
Facts: This case (Wilks v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 7:52 am
& Clinics, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 7:52 am
& Clinics, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 6:03 am
In Trupia v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own nationals under this Treaty but the executive authority of each Contracting Party shall have the power to deliver them up if, in its discretion, it considers that it is proper to do so. (2) For the purposes of this Article - (a) a reference to the executive authority of a Contracting Party shall, in the case of Australia, be construed as a reference to the Attorney-General of Australia; (b) Australian… [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 8:56 am
From Thaler v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm
Justice O’Connor, who served in a state legislature, would have known that the effects of today’s decision will be felt primarily in the states: in principle (and perhaps in practice), a single person, or small group of people, might become kingmaker, not just for a handful of important national offices, but for every major office in the country — federal, state, and local. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm
In Abood v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 1:18 pm
" Whitman v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:30 am
For diversity purposes, a person is a citizen of a state in which he or she is domiciled. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:38 am
was that person prosecuted? [read post]
