Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard" Results 2661 - 2680 of 7,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On Monday 5 December 2022, Griffiths J heard the trial in the defamation case of ABC v Palmer (QB-2021-001857). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
"The very most injured people are hurt the worst by the cap, relative to those who are the very least injured people who make a full recovery," he said. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
My slides.This is going to be an opinionated overview; I know you’re an expert audience and I’m going to try to highlight developments you may have heard less about or at least spent less time thinking about. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:25 pm by Amy Howe
For lawyers and lay people who generally don’t immerse themselves in the interstices of bankruptcy law, the most interesting part of today’s oral argument in Husky International Electronics v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
On 12 June 2020 Elisabeth Laing J handed down judgment in the case of Warnes v Forge [2020] EWHC 1496 (QB) (heard 20 May 2020). [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but four “resolved” complaints: Information Affairs Authority of Bahrain v The Independent, Clause 1, 14 December 2011 ; Mrs Kate Adams-Moor v The People, Clause 1, 13/12/2011; Brent Council v Kilburn Times Clause 1, 2, 12/12/2011; Mr Will Knock v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/12/2011. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral argument in the case of a civil rights tester who searches the internet to find hotels whose websites do not provide information about the accessibility of their facilities, as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  These were after all criminal invasions of privacy and the court heard extensive evidence of the impact upon the personal and professional lives of the victims. [read post]