Search for: "D. T. S. v. B. E. C."
Results 2681 - 2700
of 3,325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2013, 2:43 pm
Entonces me fui e hice algo que me parecía más gratificante: pensar y discutir sobre las cosas que son más complejas, importantes y más recompensadoras. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Dep’t of Econ. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
Donald and Rochelle Sterling, the LA Clippers, Racism, and California Family Law: An Outsider's Brief Legal Analysis By: Michael C. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 9:37 am
This hasn't been a problem for most of us! [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Hilliard v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
Grier: Legal Consciousness Revisited11.00 – 11.15: Coffee Break11.15 – 12.00: E. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:22 am
The Class 32 Infill Exemption and Relevant Standard of Review CEQA’s Class 32 infill development projects exemption applies to projects that: (a) are “consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations,” (b) are located “within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses[,]”… [read post]
11 May 2021, 10:22 am
” Emmanuel C. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 10:22 am
” Emmanuel C. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 10:22 am
” Emmanuel C. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Milton E. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 11:50 am
• Milton E. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:54 am
En efecto, como diría Galileo (“y sin embargo, la tierra se mueve”) pues creo a título personal que, dígalo Agamenon o su porquero, el tufo de inconstitucionalidad del Real Decreto-Ley 20/21 es intenso con el siguiente fundamento: 1.- Violación del art.31 CE que impone que el sostenimiento a las cargas públicas de todos sea por vía tributaria. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:54 am
En efecto, como diría Galileo (“y sin embargo, la tierra se mueve”) pues creo a título personal que, dígalo Agamenon o su porquero, el tufo de inconstitucionalidad del Real Decreto-Ley 20/21 es intenso con el siguiente fundamento: 1.- Violación del art.31 CE que impone que el sostenimiento a las cargas públicas de todos sea por vía tributaria. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
Redickand most of all Coach K”; (d) “she performed superbly in a 1L Ames [moot court] competition against two current members of the Elect, Michael Gottlieb and [Dorothy] Hien Tran (who were also outstanding, and who are now Danielle’s good friends)”; (e) Danielle “came up with an incisive interpretation of Shaw v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 10:12 am
R. 201(b)(2) What Happens If You Don’t Comply With A Subpoena Duces Tecum? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
And finally Eleonora updated on the CJEU's decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment where the CJEU said that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive, but Member States can protect them: "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may prohibit the provision to the public fixations of their broadcasts [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The new Prime Minister’s website also highlights transparency and accountability as the foundation of the NDA’s preferred method for governance for the next five years. [read post]
