Search for: "People v James" Results 2681 - 2700 of 3,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2022, 2:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
Then, this past Thursday, the Ramaswamy formulation appeared in Judge James Ho's concurrence in denial of en banc in Sambrano v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by familoo
Because we all know that tabloid headlines are a simple reflection of the will of the people, right? [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Judge Brinkema rightly rejected this argument, citing the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in McCreary County v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 6:44 pm by Richard Primus
  The second is his pardoning and commuting the sentences of people convicted of criminal offenses for their participation in the riot. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
“Objective reasonableness” is an appropriate touchstone for regulating force, but the ill-informed Graham v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am by Emma Snell
James Shotter reports for the Financial Times. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We don’t have to vote for the old guys v. the new guys. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  There is, of course, yet a third meaning of “fixed” that is available, as when people speak of “fixing” their dogs or cats, by which they mean neutering the animals and making it impossible for them to generate a next generation of puppies or kittens. [read post]