Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 2701 - 2720 of 3,610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2010, 6:52 am by Veronika Gaertner
Stephan Rammeloo: “Chartervertrag cum annexis – Art. 4 Abs. 2, 4 und 5 EVÜ” – the English abstract reads as follows: October 6, 2009, the ECJ gave interpretative rulings in case C-133/08 on Article 4 of the EC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Rome, 1980). [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 7:31 am by Durga Rao
restrain persons from accessing the securities market and prohibit any person associated with securities market to buy, sell or deal in securities;c. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action for declaratory and injunctive relief under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:37 am by Wolfgang Demino
., Appellees.No. 04-15-00469-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio.Delivered and Filed: July 27, 2016.DISSENTING OPINIONREBECA C. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:20 am by Marty Lederman
§§ 274a.12(a)(6), (9), (11), (c)(3), (5)-(7), (9)-(11), (14), (16)- (17), (21), and (25). [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Midgley: We get notices styled as (c) but they’re really (a)—this is content that flowed through our network but we have no way of verifying whether it was actually there since we don’t store the content, as per 512(a)’s requirements. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 7:30 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  You are cautioned that matters subject to forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including economic, regulatory, competitive and other factors, which may cause actual results or performance, including the actual terms of the transactions involving NCSLT 2007-3 and NCLST 2007-4, First Marblehead’s actual revenues or yields from the securitization, or the timing of events, to be materially different than those expressed or implied by… [read post]
The closest paragraph in the 2009 Guidelines is this:  C-VI-13 (iii) Agreement of description and claims  If the claims have been amended, will the description require corresponding amendment to remove serious inconsistency between them? [read post]