Search for: "Doe v. City of New York"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 5,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2011, 3:10 am
Joseph Gustafeste, a New York City Department of Sanitation employee, was found guilty of misconduct following his involvement in an accident while operating a department motor vehicle. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
City of Detroit[12] and Viacom Int'l Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 7:29 pm
If the moving party meets his burden, the party opposing the motion must produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of a material issue of fact that would require a trial as held in the analogous case of Zuckerman v City of New York. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 11:41 am
Parker, at the time, was the plaintiff in a discrimination lawsuit against the city of New York. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:32 am
In Doe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:15 am
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse notes that the Court’s announcement that it would grant review in Rasul v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:57 pm
Find out who you must subpoena (see if they have a New York liaison);3. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 4:37 am
In re City of New York, 5 N.Y.2d 300, 307, 184 N.Y.S.2d 585, 157 N.E.2d 587 (1959). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:05 am
Extending a promotion eligible list following wrongful disqualificationMatter of Carozza v City of New York, 37 AD3d 247Brigitte Carozza won her lawsuit contending that she and her co-plaintiffs had been “wrongfully disqualified retroactively from consideration for promotion by reason of having just been placed in new job titles” (see Matter of Carozza v City of New York, 10 AD3d 488 [2004]).* As a result,… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:34 am
State Club Ass'n v City of New York (1987), a consortium of some 125 private clubs, many of whom were allegedly organized along national origin, religious, ethnic and gender lines, challenged the New York City Human Rights Law as soon as it was enacted. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am
Justice Andrews sat on New York’s highest court for most of the 1920s and dissented from Justice Cardoza in other famous instances, including Meinhard v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am
Justice Andrews sat on New York’s highest court for most of the 1920s and dissented from Justice Cardoza in other famous instances, including Meinhard v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 7:12 am
More importantly, as it relates to the claim in this case, which is solely for retaliation under the New York City Human Rights Law ('NYCHRL'), the holding is fundamentally inconsistent with New York state court precedent interpreting the NYCHRL, which gives even more extensive rights to employees than Title VII and explicitly mandates… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:52 am
In considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the court must “‘accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory'” (Nonnon v City of New York, 9 NY3d 825, 827, quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 4:51 am
All of which is by way of introduction to three, recent court decisions by three different New York City judges addressing disputed ownership interests, two involving LLCs and one a close corporation. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Board of Education of City of New York, in which a church is seeking review of the Second Circuit’s decision upholding a city policy precluding worship services in public facilities. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
” We address in this opinion the question whether the plaintiffs (several States, the city of New York, and threeprivate land trusts) can maintain federal common law public nuisance claims against carbon-dioxide emitters(four private power companies and the federal Tennessee Valley Authority). [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 10:34 am
’ Further, [courts] may elect to retain jurisdiction despite mootness if recurring novel or substantial issues are sufficiently evanescent to evade review otherwise’ (Matter of Citineighbors Coalition of Historic Carnegie Hill v New York City Landmarks Preserv. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:14 am
April 28, 2011) The City Bar of New York has opined: "It is not unethical per se for a lawyer to represent a client who enters into a non-recourse litigation financing arrangement with a third party lender. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:53 pm
New York City Hous. [read post]
