Search for: "TAYLOR v. TAYLOR"
Results 2701 - 2720
of 4,257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2014, 9:11 am
No private right of action flows from a mere statement of general policy applicable to all Civil Service employeesMatter of Subway Surface Supervisors Assn. v New York City Tr. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 10:43 am
Let’s Make a Deal (part of the categorical analysis . . .)Betansos v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" * See Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:28 am
In this note, occasional guest blogger Paul England (senior associate, Taylor Wessing, and definitely not a shark) gives us the low-down on a recent fairly economical patent dispute in which the only things inflated were the products made by the respective parties. [read post]
26 May 2016, 10:57 am
Winslow Jr. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
., dismissal was “so disproportionate to the offense, in the light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness,” [see Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222], it probably would have directed Plaintiff's reinstatement with all, or a portion, of her back salary.* A collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the so-called Taylor Law, may provide for an alternative to this statutory… [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 9:57 am
CASE NAME: D.Q. v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:16 pm
Taylor, Abigail J. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 4:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:53 am
As reported previously on this weblog, in 2012 the World Trade Organization (WTO) Appellate Body decided in favour of Mexico in the long-standing Mexico v USA dolphin-safe labelling dispute. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
.** In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, Ct. of Appeals, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals ruled that in the absence of a Taylor Law contract providing otherwise, a municipality’s past practice does not demonstrate any right to compel the municipality to continue providing the same level of health benefits to its retirees as it has in the past.The decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 3:32 pm
v=1KONrOF--CMLa JUSTICIA de los hombres depende de los hombres, no existe un mandato divino que es la etapa -si puedo llamarla así- en que los humanos deberemos rendir cuentas al creador.El tema es ficticio, sin embargo, aborda la problemática de los hogares de acogida en los Estado Unidos, el 40% de los niños que se derivan a estos hogares son abusados y sufren tratos crueles.En el País de Biden, estos hogares perciben del Estado… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:08 am
Claire Methven O'Brien and I are delighted to announce that Human Rights Due Diligence Laws: From Due Diligence Standards to New Legal Norms will be published by Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group) in their Globalization: Law and Policy Series. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
A showing that a pending arbitration’s award may be rendered ineffectual and there is a likelihood of success is critical to obtaining a preliminary injunctionPatrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of the City of New York, Inc. v City of New York,2013 NY Slip Op 08033, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThree members [Petitioners] of the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 2:49 am
Omaha Steaks International, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 8:38 am
Aubry Johnson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 6:27 am
The KitKat KatIt will not have escaped readers that last week the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Nestlé v Cadbury [2017] EWCA Civ 358, ie the KitKat trade mark dispute. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:51 pm
Hansen v. [read post]