Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 2701 - 2720 of 3,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm by Ronald Collins
Question: You are on record as being a staunch defender of the holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
There is an abundant historical record supporting the conclusion that the United States Constitution was promoted by a core group of political leaders in order to strengthen the national government, and that the Constitution was understood by the people during the ratification debate to do just that. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States The Guardian had a piece “Chicago mayor sued by journalist for limiting interviews to reporters of color”. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
Trust as reliance and faith in character, and the expectations that this produced, were deeply embedded in the law of corporations as it developed in the United States (one notes, however, a generalized convergence of notions of director duties in European and Chinese systems; e.g., Gerner-Beuerle & Schuster, 2014, 199 (Europe); Xu et al. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It is implicated in many of the eighteen separate questions that the petitions raise, and the core question of illegality is itself a complex one. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
Germany's ban extends only to prisoners whose crimes target the integrity of the state or the democratic order, such as political insurgents. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm by Laurence Tribe
  In the landmark case of Wickard v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am by Kevin Russell
Elite Logistics, Inc., in 2007, the 10th Circuit sat en banc to review discrimination claims by an employee who alleged that his employer suspended him from work until he produced documentation of his right to work in the United States, and then fired him after he produced the documentation and demanded an apology. [read post]