Search for: "United States v. Marks" Results 2701 - 2720 of 9,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2009, 12:37 pm
Ceballos, the United States Supreme Court held that a government employee's speech made in a official capacity was not protected under the First Amendment. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm by Holly Brezee
After Beasley’s failed petitions to cancel Howard’s USPT, Beasley filed a suit in the United States District Court of New Jersey under the Lanham Act, alleging an infringement claim against Howard. [read post]
The United Kingdom Supreme Court began hearing a legal challenge centered on the definition of “woman” on Tuesday, marking the latest development in a long-running dispute between a women’s rights campaign group and the Scottish government. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 5:23 pm by Scott M. Pearson
Democratic Senator Mark Warner has introduced a bill, S.1642, that would override the Second Circuit’s decision in Madden v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
This Communication was issued as a consultation with the WTO Member States (MS) on the flexibilities available for MS to craft copyright limitations and exceptions under the principles and objectives of the TRIPS agreement.Trade MarksRiana Harvey considered the judgment of the General Court of the EU in the T-658/18 case concerning Hästens Sängar's trade mark application for its chequered figurative mark. [read post]
Citigroup, Inc., et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit clarified the limits of bankruptcy court jurisdiction over class actions. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Beth Graham
It is currently unknown whether Rheingold will file a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am by Rosalind English
Vinter and others v United Kingdom (application nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10) – read judgment  The Strasbourg Court has found three British murderers’ imprisonment for life is not inhuman or degrading and therefore not in violation of Article 3. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 2:59 pm by Nikki Siesel
On April 20, 2006 the Applicant filed a trademark application for NATIONSTAR pro se with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]