Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 14,560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2011, 12:21 am
Yesterday, administrative law judge (ALJ), Michael Chappell heard arguments in a case that the FTC brought against POM Wonderful, its parent company, Roll International, and the three officers of the companies, “individually as officers of the companies. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
” However, said the court, Colabella did not make any such claims in her petition and thus "was not required to exhaust administrative remedies prior to bringing this proceeding, as this case does not involve a matter within the scope of the grievance provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:37 am
This was the point made by the court in Levine v New York City Transit Authority, 70 AD2d 900, affirmed 49 NY2d 747. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:12 pm
McMahon also pointed out that the administration stayed almost completely out of most of the big cases before the Court, including Roe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:19 pm
With the looming uncertainty of the FTC’s restitution and disgorgement authority in light of the Supreme Court’s consideration of AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 2:41 pm
Dep't of Taxation v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
The Court’s decision in ITility, LLC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:17 pm
(Orin Kerr) In Kappos v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:09 am
Last summer, the Supreme Court struck a blow to DOL’s “regulation by amicus” program in rejecting deference to the Department’s amicus curiae brief filed in Christopher v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Today, in McCutcheon v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:25 am
Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.Halbig v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:01 am
Disciplinary penalty of dismissal sustained as consistent with the “Pell Doctrine” In re Police Officer Ruben Olavarria, etc., v Raymond W. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:27 am
” That evidence, recounted in detail in the court’s main opinion, included anti-Muslim statements that the President had made when he was campaigning for the office, but also similar statements he had made since taking office some 13 months ago. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
The court found Medlock distinguishable because (1) it involved an administrative proceeding with Indiana University rather than a criminal prosecution; (2) the officer in Medlock observed the marijuana in plain view prior to entering the dorm room; and (3) the officer in Medlock actually obtained a search warrant. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:45 pm
Negotiating disciplinary procedures for City of Schenectady police officers held a prohibited subject of collective bargainingCity of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
The court concluded that Skilling v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm
Tulalip Tribal Court (Indian Civil Rights Act; Writ of Habeas Corpus) Tribal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2019.htmlLouis-Williams v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm
Tulalip Tribal Court (Indian Civil Rights Act; Writ of Habeas Corpus) Tribal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2019.htmlLouis-Williams v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 3:00 am
§§ 247d-6d, 247d-6e] pre-empts a claim for willful misconduct,Issue on AppealDoes the PREP Act completely preempt state-law claims against a covered person relating to the administration or use of a covered countermeasure, such that the claims may be removed to federal court? [read post]
