Search for: "Price v. Price"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 18,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2016, 7:54 am
Exactly what the victory meant for the heavily regulated industry was unclear but several publicly traded companies enjoyed an immediate rise in stock prices as the potential size of the market expanded significantly. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:11 pm
Section III argues that, in the tradition of Richmond Newspapers v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:34 am
A day before Judge Brody’s ruling, the Third Circuit vacated a $295 million settlement in the De Beers case, Sullivan v. [read post]
Knoxville Bankruptcy Attorney Advises to Consider Lien Stipping for Second Mortgages in a Chapter 13
5 Apr 2011, 2:53 pm
(You can find the court case at Tanner v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am
However, plaintiff’s claims to recover damages based on the difference between the price it agreed to in settlement and either the original contract price or the fair market value of the property as of the date of closing were properly dismissed. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:16 pm
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 11:00 pm
By Eric Goldman Windsor Auctions, Inc. v. eBay, Inc., 2008 WL 2622791 (N.D. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:41 am
Price, 361 US 304, 310-311 [1960]). [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:42 pm
[and company] pricing and inventory management strategies”); and TSG Finishing, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The defence of fair comment was last considered by the House of Lords in Telnikoff v Matusevitch ([1992] 2 AC 343). [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
For the second crop of the season, instead, he purchased commodity soybeans, intended for human or animal consumption, from a grain elevator, and planted them in his fields, in order to avoid paying the premium price of Monsanto's seeds for a crop that the farmer considered 'riskier'. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
In light of the recent increased volatility in the global financial markets,1 a number of companies have raised questions regarding the desirability of repurchasing shares at reduced market prices. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 9:09 am
Manufacturers must be delighted and discounters devastated by today's 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:03 am
The first appellant and second appellant argued that, in addition to the recorded sale price, the second appellant had also assumed debts of £1.85m owed by LGDC to the liquidator, which meant the sale was not a gratuitous alienation. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
Khan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 4:20 am
., Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., No 04 C 5312, Slip op. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 4:20 am
., Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., No 04 C 5312, Slip op. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 6:54 am
Fortugno v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:51 am
Torres v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 7:39 am
It's good for pricing; correct? [read post]
