Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 3,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Citing Scott v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:03 pm
Holder. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:12 pm
However, In their 2016 article, Hemel & Ouellette explain that the opposite rule would be the one more likely to “lower prices of patented goods in the United States and raise prices abroad. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 11:31 am
That changed on October 26, 2006, when the Florida Supreme Court ruled in State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
In recent years, we’ve … said … that a statute does not apply outside the United States unless it says that it applies outside the United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:07 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am
The Journal describes how secret negotiations between Iran and the United States, dating back to 2009 and facilitated by Oman, have made possible a potential nuclear deal. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/29/10-99021o.pdf United State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm
Cir. 2004), the specification may be used to interpret what the patent holder meant by a word or phrase in the claim,E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 4:31 pm
Consequently, the Court affirmed the suppression order.State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
By virtue of having followed the Microsoft v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am
For a detailed overview of Ruscoe v Cryptopia,please refer to our previous publication: Cryptocurrencies are property capable of being held on trust, New Zealand High Court holds The Hon Madam Justice Linda Chan noted that “the preponderance of jurisprudence recognises the proprietary nature of cryptocurrencies” and included case law on cryptocurrencies being considered as “property” (or similar definition) in various jurisdictions including England and Wales, the… [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm
Holder and Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
With nearly half of the country now living in states which have legalized marijuana at least for medical purposes, it is no longer accurate to state that there is “no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States” — if this was ever true to begin with. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
With nearly half of the country now living in states which have legalized marijuana at least for medical purposes, it is no longer accurate to state that there is “no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States” — if this was ever true to begin with. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
United States Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 8:51 am
(See, e.g., Kaiser Aetna v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Political campaigns raise the ire of copyright holders and newscasters A Canadian Lawyer’s perspectives MegaUpload Golan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 1:20 pm
Elsewhere, I have explained why Founding-era understandings of "invasion" are limited to large-scale armed attacks, and do not cover things like illegal migration or drug smuggling (for more detail, see my amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
