Search for: "Jones v. United States" Results 2741 - 2760 of 3,443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States, shareholder primacy continues to define the legal standard.[15] “While many deplored the disconnect between corporate power and social need, and CSR . . . became a more frequent discussion topic in corporate and academic circles, not many corporations acted meaningfully in pursuing CSR. [read post]
16 May 2022, 10:59 am by Amy Howe
The court also sought the Biden administration’s views in United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
In the United States such rights are an aspect of the tort of privacy – the so-called “right to publicity” (for a recent case on these see here). [read post]
I
7 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm by cdw
” David Wyatt Jones v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Asarco LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm by Suzanne Ito
Pineda-Moreno, a Ninth Circuit case that could play a significant role in determining how broadly the Supreme Court's recent GPS tracking decision, United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm by Miriam Baer
 And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage… [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This controversial tool, which the Constitution says absolutely nothing about, is an example of an institutional rule that, for better or worse, has impacted constitutional development within the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:49 am by Danielle Citron
 The constitutional implications of mass quantities of data were at the heart of five Justices’ concurrences in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Steve Honig
  In the last Bush Administration, the President’s legal office stated that the Federal government could share enforcement of Federal policy with the States, and that the States therefore could have concurrent authority. [read post]