Search for: "Jones v. United States"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 3,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States, shareholder primacy continues to define the legal standard.[15] “While many deplored the disconnect between corporate power and social need, and CSR . . . became a more frequent discussion topic in corporate and academic circles, not many corporations acted meaningfully in pursuing CSR. [read post]
16 May 2022, 10:59 am
The court also sought the Biden administration’s views in United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 3:05 pm
[1] See Jones v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 8:33 am
Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979) and United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm
In the United States such rights are an aspect of the tort of privacy – the so-called “right to publicity” (for a recent case on these see here). [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:00 am
” Bob Jones University v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm
” David Wyatt Jones v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:45 am
Jones. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Asarco LLC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:04 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
Judge Jolly cited United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
Pineda-Moreno, a Ninth Circuit case that could play a significant role in determining how broadly the Supreme Court's recent GPS tracking decision, United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage… [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 1:24 am
United States, 471 U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
This controversial tool, which the Constitution says absolutely nothing about, is an example of an institutional rule that, for better or worse, has impacted constitutional development within the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:49 am
The constitutional implications of mass quantities of data were at the heart of five Justices’ concurrences in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
In the last Bush Administration, the President’s legal office stated that the Federal government could share enforcement of Federal policy with the States, and that the States therefore could have concurrent authority. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
United States, 528 U.S. 49, 120 S. [read post]